From: Rabbi Moshe Sofer
To: Unknown recipient
The Chasam Sofer resolves three analytical challenges posed by Rabbi Akiva Eiger regarding ox damages. He distinguishes kedushas haguf from kedushas damim to explain why the injured party must pay a perutah to hekdesh, resolves an internal contradiction in the Rambam using this distinction, argues that a mu'ad ox's death sentence does not eliminate the owners' personal monetary liability, and respectfully disputes Rabbi Akiva Eiger's proof from the Rashba regarding a gazlan who rents stolen property by distinguishing between sale and rental.
Source: Shu"t Chasam Sofer CM §165